The Ethical and Hygienic Concerns Surrounding Circumcision
Circumcision, often performed on infants without their consent, raises profound ethical questions and is increasingly viewed as unnecessary and potentially harmful.
Firstly, From an ethical standpoint, subjecting a non-consenting individual to a surgical alteration of their body violates principles of bodily autonomy and medical ethics. Babies are unable to provide informed consent, leaving them vulnerable to a procedure that permanently alters their anatomy.
Secondly circumcision is a surgical procedure that, like any surgery, carries inherent risks of infection and complications. Even when performed under sterile conditions, there's a risk of bleeding and surgical errors that can lead to adverse outcomes.
Thirdly, the removal of the foreskin, a protective layer of skin covering the glans of the penis, can result in decreased sensitivity and potential sexual dysfunction later in life. This alteration to natural anatomy can disrupt normal sexual function and impact overall sexual health.
Furthermore, the hygiene argument often used to justify circumcision is flawed. The foreskin is a natural and protective part of the male anatomy, providing important functions such as maintaining moisture, protecting against infections, and enhancing sexual sensitivity. Removing it can lead to dryness, irritation, and potential complications.
In terms of hygiene, proper education on genital care and regular cleaning are sufficient to maintain cleanliness and prevent issues like infections. The notion that circumcision is necessary for hygiene is outdated and lacks scientific support.
What’s more remarkable is that American parents are almost alone in the Western world in choosing circumcision for reasons other than religion. It wasn't until the mid-19th century, though, that circumcision gained popularity in the medical community. In Britain, it was seen as a means to promote chastity and deter masturbation, which at the time was seen as a pathological practice that led to all sorts of harm, including blindness and mental illness. Pediatric manuals continued to recommend circumcision as a deterrent against masturbation until the 1950s.
Ultimately, the decision to circumcise should be based on comprehensive information, consideration of ethical principles, and respect for individual autonomy. As awareness grows about the ethical and hygienic concerns associated with circumcision, more individuals are advocating for alternative approaches that prioritize bodily integrity and informed decision-making.
Additional resources
https://evidencebasedbirth.com/evidence-and-ethics-on-circumcision/
